The Climate Crisis and the Consequences of Denial and Supression

 


When it comes to the climate crisis, the beginning of Donald Trump’s second term in the white house was truly unprecedented and shocking. He reveals to the public that we have entered a national energy emergency, stating how the costs of energy are rising drastically. But what can we attach to these statements? To begin, we need to understand the relationship between energy efficiency and carbon emissions. In 2023, a report titled: “2023 Energy Efficiency Impact Report”, released by Alliance stated the many benefits of energy efficiency as the costs rise. Some notable points demonstrated in the report are working to reduce carbon emissions, while also creating job opportunities. In the report, it is stated:  “Today, 40% of all energy jobs in the U.S. relate to energy efficiency – totaling 2.2 million workers in 2021. The report also reinforces energy efficiency as a key climate solution: in 2021, the U.S. would have produced 78% higher carbon emissions without the energy efficiency investments already in place.”  This directly opposes what Trump had said in regards to how America “needs” to use fossil fuels even though we are seeing the negative impacts on our planet. The report  illustrates how energy efficiency fuels the economy, stating:  “The majority of states are implementing energy efficiency resource standards and have seen 4x energy savings compared to states without a standard.  States that invest in utility energy efficiency programs have also been shown to save more for customers.  On top of that, building energy codes have reduced energy use in new buildings by more than 40% over three decades.”   Even in a report by The Natural Resources Defense Council, they talk about how harnessing technology to help reduce carbon emissions, it seems confusing why more people aren’t more aware of these statistics, to answer that, it is because of Trump’s ideas of trying to deny and abandon the people who are affected by climate change.



(Above), Image of an individual using a more energy efficient setting on their washing machine.
[Photo credit: StockX]

 While observing the objectives written by authors of Project 2025, the climate crisis is completely denied and ignored, as it claims that America has   “No reason to transition away from fossil fuels. Instead, they doubled down on oil and gas, long the federal government’s most incentivized “winner” of energy subsidies. Domestic fossil fuel production is to be encouraged still further, while federal support for cleaner alternatives is to be curbed or eliminated.”  This alone should be cause for alarm, as creating and maintaining sustainable forms of energy is already way more difficult as it is, and now these resources will begin to disappear. In another section, specifically, Unnameable Challenge #3–Scenic and Ecological Preservation, it is illustrated that oil extraction is going to be heavily prioritized, which could damage the habitats of endangered species. There are already over 1,000 endangered species in the United States alone, and that number will slowly increase, especially with the increasing amount of natural disasters. 



(Above) Statistics of the costs from climate-related natural disasters from 1980-2021.

[Photo Credit: Climate.gov]




Despite the fact that climate change is becoming more and more impactful, The Trump Administration has tried to sweep things under the rug as if the climate crisis is nonexistent, determined to ignore warnings in order to feed their immense desire for money. In fact, the Environmental Protection Agency was forced to retract information which determined that climate change is a threat to public health and welfare in 2009. They were also forced to eliminate clean vehicle standards, which would’ve cut down the amount of carbon emissions significantly. According to Manish Bapna, the president & CEO of NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council): “This is the single biggest attack in history on the federal government’s efforts to tackle the climate crisis. Nearly 20 years after the Supreme Court confirmed the EPA’s authority to act, the Trump Administration is leaving American families on their own to deal with the consequences. With millions of Americans facing stronger storms, hotter heat waves, and more dangerous wildfires, the Trump administration is trying to pretend it’s all a hoax and there’s nothing to be done about it. But the impacts of climate change are right here, right now.” In turn, Trump is essentially abandoning the people that will be left behind at the mercy of our planet’s rising heat. On the other hand, all the billionaires would be living it up without worry since the people’s money will pay for their survival. The whole point of the Environmental Protection Agency is supposed to protect people, but it is crystal clear that Trump is ultimately trying to erase resources intended for the sole purpose of educating people on the climate crisis.





According to the U.S Geological Survey, there are effects such as loss of agriculture, increased heat waves, natural disasters, and species loss. Despite the abundance of resources people can use, they are slowly being deleted, as detailed in an article published by E&E News, the Trump Administration has been deleting billions of dollars worth of climate research from Climate.gov, which makes accessibility for educational resources extremely difficult. E&E News states how: “Meanwhile, the government itself has become an antagonist to many of the groups trying to preserve its vanishing resources. The Trump administration has promoted a variety of scientific misinformation this year, researchers say, including widely discredited theories about vaccines and climate change.” proving that it is important to educate and preserve resources illuminating the climate crisis.




(Below) EPA employees take part in a national march against actions by the Trump administration last March in Philadelphia.

[Photo Credit: Matt Rourke]
















10 comments:

  1. This reminded me of when I asked a guy why people can do things for profit so easily but not for purpose, and he said "comfort". I guess when our society takes the comfort of nature away and only provides the comfort of consumption and convenience for a price, then people also change. Thanks for spreading awareness, even if our government refuses to.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You do a great job of directly engaging with political rhetoric from the Trump administration. You combine evidence-based arguments with a clear and critical perspective.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow really enjoyed the data you have added. Makes it really easy to see those real impacts. Especially the graph depicting how much we have spent on "natural disasters".

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like how you point out the energy crisis and how talking about an energy crisis should talk about climate change, but the connection is somehow lost.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I really liked your blog post! I liked how you talked about Trump's boost in extracting oil and how damaging it will be to ecosystems.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 4X energy savings for countries with efficiency energy standards is huge. We need to think more like them not just for the planet, but our health and many generations to come.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I like how you pointed out that energy efficiency contributes to the economy, because that is the #1 most important issue to people right now. Unfortunately, that is why Trump became president again (even though he lied to everyone about bringing down the cost of everything). I feel like if more people knew about how climate change impacted the economy, more people would care about it. Sadly, I think people care more about their money than they do the environment. Also, I enjoyed the images you used in your post, I thought they did a great job portraying what you wrote. Fantastic job!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Your post was very thoughtful. You did a great job of using the data to challenge the idea that fossil fuels are necessary. Good job!

    ReplyDelete
  9. This post did a great job clearly outlining the damage done to the energy sector during this administration, as well as explaining where the inconsistencies are. This was a very educational read, and would be especially useful in a setting where the public can educate themselves about the basics of energy during this administration.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Your post does a great job using evidence to show how energy efficiency can both reduce carbon emissions and support the economy. I liked how you included statistics about job creation and energy savings because they directly challenged claims that fossil fuels are the only solution to rising energy costs. 

    ReplyDelete

Climate Politics

  The $1 Billion Reverse-Subsidy: Taxpayers Paying to Stop Clean Energy In a move that has stunned energy analysts and fiscal conservatives ...