What comes to mind when you consider the climate crisis?
Climate science? Let’s also consider activism. Advocacy, while we’re
at it. Let’s also bear environmental quality in mind. Are you seeing correlation
yet? How about a few more topics? Diversity, injustice, pollution? Every
single one of these italicized terms (and a great many more) is flagged and
suppressed within government sources and documentation under the Trump
administration. Every
single one.
The Trump administration was founded on a disinformation campaign, sired from the distortion of words and manipulation that have been deeply embedded within our governance in less than a decade. The omission of the key terms and topics listed above is intentional, malicious, and devastatingly dangerous. And it is only an emblem of the greater denial and manipulation beneath the surface of the governmental websites and public service announcements that bear them. The administration is waging war on the prospect of an educated society, even now, under the guise of protecting us from overwhelming consideration of the climate crisis and being wracked with anxiety resultingly. “Climate communication that downplays the dangers of climate change for fear of inducing despair will, at best, fail to address the political source of young people’s anxiety – and could make young people feel all the more gaslit, as though climate scientists themselves were yet another constituency refusing to take their fears seriously” (Genevieve Guenther, The Language of Climate Politics). Ignorance is no longer bliss – it is a weaponized inundation masterfully orchestrated to control an increasingly incapable and dependent society.
Twenty-three days after the Trump administration took office
for the second and (god willing) final time, the Environmental Protection
Agency was forced
into repealing their public mandates that stipulated greenhouse gas
emissions and clean operation standards from American corporations. The climate
director of the National Resources Defense Council responded with, “they want
to make corporations money, and they don’t care about the impacts on people”.
Unsurprisingly, the Trump administration is deeply-rooted in corporate greed,
with both our House and Senate – our representatives, our legal defenders – funded
by oil companies in multitudes of millions of dollars. And, of course,
helmed by a man whose net worth nearly rivals the entirety of the budget of the Environmental
Protection Agency (a federal agency that employs fourteen thousand people).
The damages caused by the Trump administration’s war on public education and environmental protection will long outlive the administration itself and likely condemn us to the third degree of warming that will render our climate crisis self-sustaining. We could not afford to lose half the time and progress that this administration has cost us in our battle against climate change, and it will only exacerbate the difficulty in our fight for generations to come (if we are fortunate enough to have multiple generations left).
We are only a year into the second term of this administration and, seemingly, the second coming of the antichrist. We cannot allow the remaining three years to come to pass under them, lest it cost us our grandchildren and a myriad of species whose biodiversity will not be replicated for millennia to come.


This really shows how deep the disinformation goes removing key climate terms, rolling back EPA standards, and pushing corporate interests all at once. The way language is being stripped out makes the crisis harder to even acknowledge, which is exactly the point. It’s a clear example of how controlling information shapes public understanding and slows real action.
ReplyDeleteI think it is good you brought some light to the fact that this is really largely an operation to generate wealth for certain corporations. Also how you showed the vast impacts of what disinformation can do and how the impacts of what the Trump admin has done will unfortunately long outlive him and we are all going to have to deal with the consequences.
ReplyDeleteThis reminded me of when I recently learned about what "think tanks" are, which are basically just TAX-EXEMPT nonprofits that funnel millions to influence political decisions. Ever heard of AIPAC? Is this basically like large-scale money laundering for billionaires? For background, to be a tax-exempt 501(c)(3), you are supposed to serve the "common good," and you're not allowed to participate in lobbying. Yet there are literally tax-exempt "think tanks" that actively invest in misinforming the general public on things such as "climate change is not real" and influence politics. These types of organizations use tax codes and strategically brand themselves as "educational" think tanks, showing that even our nonprofit systems have been regressed by the same greed we see displayed in the Trump admin.
ReplyDeleteI loved reading through your blog post! I liked how you used the debunking of the finding that green house gas emissions are harmful as evidence for the spread of disinformation.
ReplyDeleteI like how you brough up that Trump's choices will impact us long after he leaves office.
ReplyDeleteThe way you framed the timeline is great. Being only a year into the second term and already facing a potential self-sustaining crisis brings so much awareness about the actions being made in the second term.
ReplyDeleteThe intro to this blog was very catching and informative - it hooked me right away. This writing is very important to highlight disinformation this administration weaponizes against the American people everyday.
ReplyDeleteI appreciated the bluntness and urgency you used during this post. Calling out the malice and intention behind the harm this administration has done is very important and takes courage. That being said, be aware that calling this trump's (god willing) final term may cause people on the opposing side to discredit what you say regardless of whether it is true or not. I enjoyed your post and found it very informative but I am not the one that needs to be convinced, and I have found that when trying to resonate with people who are know to resonate with misinformation, lies, and lack of empirical evidence, you need all the help you can get.
ReplyDelete